Refuting Evolution


Life from “Non-Life”
  • In order for the principles of mutation and natural selection in the theory of evolution to work, there have to be living things for them to work on. Life must exist before it can to start diversifying. Life had to come from somewhere, and the theory of evolution proposes that it arose spontaneously out of the inert chemicals of planet Earth perhaps 4 billion years ago.
  • Evolutionists have an elaborate explanation for how one species may have evolved from another but fall short on providing a reasonable explanation of how we got life from non-life.

 

Complexity

  • The simplest organism isn’t so simple!
  • The creation of life is tremendously complex. It requires both DNA (the plan) and RNA (the copy mechanism) at the same time.

Cell

  • Complexity does not arise from randomness
         -Second Law of Thermodynamics: things naturally tend to decay
         -Information Science: information never arises out of random chance
  • Consider the Complexity of the Eye

 

 complex_eye_500
  • Mutations

 

-The proposed mechanism of evolution is inadequate.
         ~All known mutations are harmful; natural selection cannot create something new.
-Contrary to theories that mutations produce superior species, mutations have historically been harmful or lethal and have never been known to create something better!
Ex. Siamese Twins
Ex. Animals & Humans that are born deficient
-The Theory of Evolution attempts to claim the we are the result of millions of years worth of accidents!